CustomGPT.ai Blog

6 Best Glean Alternatives in 2025! (All Tested)

TL;DR

Glean is an AI-powered platform that combines enterprise search, AI assistants, and AI agents to help teams find the information they need across workplace tools like Jira, Slack, etc.

When choosing an alternative to Glean, you want to look for;

  • AI-powered contextual search (not just keyword matching)
  • Possible integrations with your existing tools
  • Strong security certifications (SOC 2, GDPR, ISO 27001)
  • Ease of setup without requiring extensive IT resources
  • Flexible pricing that scales with your team

Based on my detailed testing, the top three Glean alternatives I recommend are: CustomGPT, Coveo, and Elastic Enterprise Search. 

My overall best alternative is CustomGPT. This tool offers citation-backed answers with inline sources, integrates with major tools like Slack, Notion, and Google Drive, and starts at just $89/month for 3 team members. 

For large enterprises with complex needs and six-figure budgets, Coveo is worth considering for its advanced AI recommendations and deep customization. 

For developer-focused teams building custom search into applications, Elastic Enterprise Search could be a great alternative because of its open-source flexibility with robust API capabilities.

Key Takeaways

  • Glean is a strong enterprise search platform, but it’s geared toward large organizations and priced accordingly. There’s also no free trial or self-serve plan, and many smaller teams may find the platform too heavy for their needs.
  • When evaluating alternatives, look closely at how well each tool handles semantic, context-aware search beyond keyword matching. Integrations also matter: Google Drive, Slack, Notion, Confluence, SharePoint, and CRMs are must-haves for most teams. 

Security certifications like SOC 2, GDPR, and ISO 27001 are non-negotiable if you’re going to be storing sensitive data.

  • Cost-wise, Glean alternatives range widely. GoSearch offers a free tier for small teams. Meilisearch starts at $30/month, while Guru follows a per-seat pricing model at $25/user/month.

CustomGPT starts at $89/month for 3 users, offering predictable pricing for growing teams. Enterprise solutions like Coveo and Elastic Enterprise Search typically start around $99–$114/month or require custom quotes based on usage and data volume.

  • When picking the right Glean alternative, if you have a:
    • Small team (1–10 people): Then you want to prioritize easy setup and affordability. I would recommend CustomGPT, GoSearch, or Meilisearch.
    • Mid-sized team (10–50 people): You would need stronger integrations, automation, and analytics. CustomGPT Pro or Elastic are good fits.

Large enterprise (50+ employees): With many data sources and compliance requirements, platforms like Coveo or Guru would make more sense.

When we talk about enterprise search platforms, Glean often pops out. But that’s not the only tool out there.

There are many reasons why today, you might be reading about the best Glean alternatives:

  • You’re probably considering switching from Glean.
  • Glean’s pricing isn’t public, and according to some sources, it could be way above your budget
  • The platform seems complex and too advanced for your business needs.

These are also the same reasons some clients who switched to our platform, CustomGPT, often mentioned.

At the end of the day, you are not just looking for an enterprise search platform. What you want is one that is cost-effective, easy to use, and most importantly, meets your unique business needs.

That’s exactly what I am covering in this article. I will share my best Glean alternatives.

I tested their most interesting features, saw their strengths and limitations. After reading this, you should have good enough knowledge to choose your best alternative.

Let’s go!

Best Glean Alternatives: Quick Comparison

Tool Key Integrations Free plan Starting price
CustomGPT Drive
SharePoint
MCP
Notion
Confluence
Zendesk
Slack
❌ (7-day trial) $89/month 
Coveo AWS
Box
Confluence
Dropbox
Google Drive
❌ (14-day trial) Custom pricing
Elastic Enterprise Search Atlassian Jira
AWS
Azure
Beats
Box
❌ (14-day trial) $99/month
Meilisearch Python
Dart
Java
Script
Swift
Symfony
Golang
Ruby
❌ (14-day trial) $30/month
GoSearch GitHub
Slack
HubSpot
BambooHR
Google Drive
Microsoft Teams
Salesforce
✅ Yes $0/user/month
Guru Claude
Microsoft Copilot
ChatGPT
Adobe Workfront
Azure DevOps
OneDrive
❌ No $25/user/month

If you want to see how this actually works with your own data, take the 7-day trial. It’s the easiest way to get a real sense of it.

6 Best Glean Alternatives

1. CustomGPT.ai

CustomGPT.ai homepage highlights “Transform Knowledge Retrieval with AI-Driven Precision Search” and top-7 GenAI ranking.
My rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 4.5/5
Base price: $89/mo, paid annually
Integrates with: Slack, Notion, Google Drive, HubSpot, Zapier
Best for: SMBs to small businesses with enterprise search deployment needs

Our first best Glean alternative on this list is CustomGPT.ai

One thing I love is that CustomGPT offers Citation‐backed answers with inline source links. 

Beyond that, you can connect all your data (1,400+ file formats) and broad enterprise connectors such as Drive, SharePoint, MCP, Notion, and more.

But there’s a whole lot more that CustomGPT offers. Let’s get into those.

First off, it’s worth noting that it won’t take you more than 3 clicks to create your first agent. All you need to do is select a data source for your agent, and then choose how you want to use it.

Glean alternative chat answers API-limit question, citing 429 Too Many Requests and company_api_limits_policy_2025.pdf
Glean alternatives are compared on API rate-limit behavior, including Retry-After support and policy citations.

With the Lead capture feature active, your agents will save you hours by collecting leads’ information, such as name, email, and company name, during chats. It can also send your leads directly into Salesforce or HubSpot.

Glean alternatives comparison shows chat reply on API limits, asking for email or company name with copy icon.
6 Glean alternatives compared: chatbot gives API reliability notes, then gates quota details behind contact info.

Now, the dashboard is your go-to feature if you want to view your team’s performance and other metrics that are important to you. You can see the number of conversations, queries, and queries per conversation on there.

Using Customer Intelligence, you can analyze chatter behavior and demographics. I enjoyed exploring where users came from, how often certain keywords were searched, trends in sentiment & search intent, and what content gaps I could fill.

CustomGPT.ai team dashboard displays 28 conversations, 72 queries, and 2 human hours saved this week.
CustomGPT.ai dashboard includes country-level conversation mapping to contextualize team query activity.

But that’s not all. In fact, I can’t go on without mentioning our AI copilot. It functions as your buddy. You can literally ask for help with anything, and it will go the extra mile for you.

Glean alternatives interface shows AI reply to “I need help with my Marketing strategies” and 1,189 docs read.
Best Glean alternatives dashboard pairs AI marketing guidance with document and word-count analytics.

Key Features

1. Agents

Agents do more than just retrieve information. They can use your custom knowledge to perform many actions, such as sending updates to your CRM, automating routine workflows, or refreshing internal documentation based on content gaps.

You can use agent actions, MCP connectors, or API for advanced users. You can also use integrations like Zapier.

But right now, I am simply going to show you how easy it is to create an agent with CustomGPT and find relevant information.

After signing in, click “New agent”

CustomGPT.ai Agents dashboard lists Cogni with 31 documents and Enterprise Search Agent with 2 documents.
CustomGPT.ai dashboard compares added vs read document counts across two enterprise search agents.

Next, choose a data source for your agent. For this tutorial, I will select “File upload”.

CustomGPT.ai data source picker shows File Upload selected among Website, WordPress, YouTube, with SOC 2/GDPR note.
CustomGPT.ai, a Glean alternative, groups connectors into Popular, Drives, and Web data sources.

After that, upload your file.

Glean alternatives interface shows “Build By Uploading Your Files” with company_ap... (3.5 KB) and AI Vision option.
Glean alternatives comparison: document-ingestion setup includes upload flow and optional AI Vision parsing.

When you click “Advanced options”, you will see other interesting settings. You can, for example, decide to keep your file for “Viewing in Results” or delete it immediately after processing. You can also turn AI Vision Processing on or off.

Glean alternatives interface shows file upload with Advanced options toggled on for OCR, AI Vision, and data retention.
Glean alternatives comparison: upload workflow exposes 4 per-file processing controls in Advanced settings.

Now, it’s time to select how you want to use your agent.  Among the available options, I will go with Enterprise Search.

Glean alternatives setup dialog highlights Enterprise Search for internal knowledge base Q&A, with a Continue button
Glean alternatives onboarding maps Enterprise Search against four other use cases before deployment.

The agent is ready. From the get-go, it will suggest questions you can start with. 

The file I uploaded was about API. This is the question I started with: “What happens when a user or system exceeds its API limit?”

CustomGPT.ai interface displays API-limit research prompt and matching query input, with sidebar tools and send icon
CustomGPT.ai, one of six Glean alternatives tested, links query drafting to API-rate-limit analysis.

Within seconds, the agent provided accurate answers based on the file I uploaded. The answer came with the source referenced in it.

Glean alternatives chat UI explains API over-limit handling with 429 Too Many Requests and policy_2025.pdf source.
Glean alternatives comparison shows which assistants use auto-retry backoff and source-grounded answers.

You can click on the link to retrieve that information.

Glean alternatives guide shows "Handling Limit Exceeding" policy: 429 Too Many Requests and temporary API key suspension.
Glean alternatives comparison notes which tools expose Retry-After headers and per-minute request quotas.

2. Lead capture

We recently introduced Lead Capture, a feature that lets your agent do more than just chat with visitors. Your agent can collect their information, such as name, email, and company name, and then turn them into leads.

Let’s try it!

Go to your agent section, and click “Actions”.

CustomGPT.ai Actions (Beta) panel shows Lead Capture, Drive Conversions, Webpage Awareness, and Document Analyst inactive.
CustomGPT.ai in our Glean alternative tests: Actions (Beta) lists four built-in modules, all disabled.

You can turn on the Lead capture button.

Glean alternatives comparison shows Actions • My Agent with four Beta cards inactive and Add Custom Action button.
6 Glean alternatives in 2025 are compared by agent automation depth and custom action setup.

It’s time to configure your lead capture. Choose the information you want your agent to attempt to collect. If that’s not enough, you can still add other fields.

Glean alternative lead capture settings list Name, Phone number, Email, and Company, with UTM tags disabled.
Glean alternative form setup uses 4 required contact fields while UTM tracking remains turned off.

Now, your agent is currently private. However, you can make it public and share it with everyone.

Customgpt.ai Ask My Agent shows Share Your Agent modal with private/public toggle and Copy Link & Close button
CustomGPT.ai lets teams switch agent access modes, a key sharing control in our Glean alternative tests.

This way, when a visitor chats with the agent, it will find a way to collect the visitor’s information.

Glean alternatives chat UI shows API limit query, assistant reply on usage tracking, and request for email or company.
Glean alternatives comparison: one of 6 tested tools surfaces API quota analytics at admin scope.

Back to the platform! By clicking the three-dot menu, you can download the leads your agent had a chat with.

Glean alternative dashboard shows My Agent Actions with Lead Capture active (28 Oct–28 Nov 2025) and Configure menu.
Glean alternative dashboard tracks Agent Actions over a 31-day window with configurable workflows.

CustomGPT will send you an Email with a link to export your leads.

CustomGPT.ai notifies user leads export is complete with a 'here' download link that expires in 24 hours.
CustomGPT.ai uses asynchronous CSV lead exports, a key workflow in Glean alternative testing.

3. Dashboard

We also provide a team dashboard that displays how many hours your agents save you every week.

You will also see your total number of conversations, queries, and queries per conversation. 

As I mentioned earlier, it also shows the different countries your conversations are from.

CustomGPT.ai Marketing Team Dashboard shows agents saved 2 human hours this week and 28 conversations by country.
CustomGPT.ai dashboard combines time-saved KPIs with country-level chat distribution for team performance review.

Below, you have access to more insights: How many queries were made, who sent them, where they came from, and how many were successful.

Glean alternatives dashboard shows query trend peaking near 35 on Tue 28 Oct, with 98.6% success in last 7 days.
Glean alternatives comparison tracks daily query volume alongside 7-day answer reliability benchmarks.

What I enjoyed vs what gave me a hard time

What I enjoyed 👍
✅ Has a clean interface making it easy to locate all the features on the sidebar menu
✅ You can create a custom agent in three clicks, which shows how easy it is to use.
✅ Your agent can easily collect leads’ information, such as name, email, or company name. 
✅ The platform integrates with HubSpot, Slack, Notion, WordPress, Zendesk, and Zapier
✅ The dashboard tells you how many hours your agents save you every week 
What gave me a hard time 👎
❌ Total batch size limit for uploads is 1 GB. However, you can either split them into smaller parts or connect sources like Google Drive or SharePoint to sync your files.

Best for

  • SMBs to small enterprises who want to deploy enterprise search functionality rapidly, without extensive dev resources.

Pricing

  • Standard: $89/month/ 3 team members, billed annually
  • Premium: $449/month, billed annually
  • Enterprise: Custom pricing
Glean alternatives pricing table lists Standard $89, Premium $449, and Enterprise with SOC-2 and SSO.
Glean alternatives comparison: six tested tools, with this vendor offering a 3-tier plan.

2. Coveo

Coveo AI-Relevance Platform highlights enterprise ROI with Salesforce 200% self-service success and Cisco 55% ML clicks.
Coveo is evaluated as a 2025 Glean alternative focused on enterprise AI search and relevance tuning.
My rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 4/5 
Base price: Custom pricing
Integrates with: AWS, Box, Confluence, Dropbox, Google Drive
Best for: Large enterprises with complex search needs

Coveo is the next best Glean alternative we’ll look at. 

It unifies structured and unstructured content into a single index. It also offers semantic search, AI recommendations, and GenAI answering.

I added Coveo to this list for a couple of reasons, and we’ll get to that right away.

With Coveo, you will need a search page before you can search a company’s data. And to add one, you have to choose a type, name your page, and assign it to a project.

Glean alternative search page shows query “Client” with 1–10 of 24 results and Sort by set to Relevance.
Glean alternative results view shows first-page coverage of 42% (10 of 24) for the “Client” query.

Moreover, you can find relevant information from your company without leaving your current workflow when you use the In-Product Experience. But first, you must name the In-Product Experience(IPX), adjust your filtering options, and style.

Glean alternatives guide shows search results for “SaaS,” with “Results 1-10 of 36” and agency-focused titles.
Glean alternatives comparison tests 6 tools on connector depth, permission sync, and relevance quality.

If I want to keep all my searches organized, I can create projects for them. I first select a project type, name my project, add a description, and an email.

Small Support Search Portal shows Overview and Resources tabs with Oct 16, 2025 project details.
Glean alternative example: Small Support Search Portal organizes project support search in two tabs.

And because enterprise search software can only retrieve data that it has been fed, you may want to add your content. The way to do it is simply by choosing your preferred sources: file uploads, website, or sitemaps, just to name a few.

Glean alternative search UI shows “Privacy policy” results, Pipeline: Empty, and Today index times by Relevance.
6 Glean alternatives are benchmarked by index freshness and ingestion pipeline health.

Key Features

1. Search Pages

Coveo is also best known as an AI-powered enterprise search tool. Using the search pages feature, you can search for information or data across your company. 

But before you can do any of that, you must create a search page.

Now, let’s create one.

Glean alternatives comparison shows Search section with Search Pages highlighted and Add a search page button.
Glean alternatives comparison: one of six tested tools supports multiple Search Pages per workspace.

I can choose my search page type from three options: Legacy Interface Editor, Code only, or Simple builder. The “Simple builder” is what I will use.

Glean alternatives comparison shows Coveo Add a search page options: Simple builder, Legacy Interface Editor, Code only
Glean alternatives list: Coveo is 1 of 6 tools tested, with separate no-code, legacy, and code workflows.

The next step is to name my search page and assign it to a project, if I have one.

Glean alternative interface displays “Add a search page” modal with Name set to Global Knowledge Search and Add button
Glean alternative example showing configurable global knowledge search-page setup workflow.

Now that your search page is ready, you can always edit, share, or delete it.

After creating my search page, I opened it.

Coveo Search Pages lists Global Knowledge Search as a Simple Builder page, last modified Oct 16, 2025 at 3:30 PM.
Coveo Search Pages shows Global Knowledge Search configured as a Simple Builder workspace for intranet use.

The interface had a clean look, which makes it easy to get around.

Glean alternatives search interface shows Results 1-10 of 36, Source filter (36), and Sort by Relevance dropdown.
Glean alternatives comparison view highlights a unified index of 36 items with source-level filtering.

To test the search page, I entered  “Client” in the search bar. I waited a few seconds, and different results popped up. I could just scroll and select the result I wanted.

Glean alternatives comparison shows a “Client” query with results 1–10 of 24 and relevance sort dropdown.
Glean alternatives benchmark compares six enterprise search tools using the same “Client” query criteria.

2. In-Product Experience

The In-Product Experience on Coveo is a lightweight search tool you can use to find relevant information within the app without leaving your current workflow.

Let’s create one!

Glean alternative interface shows “Embed search anywhere” with an “Add in-product experience” button highlighted
Glean alternative setup maps embedded search to in-product experiences, one of 6 tools tested in 2025.

First, enter a descriptive name for your IPX configuration.

Glean alternative dashboard opens Add an In-Product Experience (IPX) modal with Search my Enterprise field
Glean alternative UI shows IPX modal configuration with enterprise-search scope and in-app trigger controls.

In the next window, you can configure your IPX’s filtering options, style, settings, or version history.

Glean alternatives UI shows “Search results display” with Filtering options, Style, Settings, and Version history
Glean alternatives comparison: six tools are assessed by customizable result layouts and versioned UI settings.

Under style, for instance, I could adjust the theme, select a background color, fonts, and much more.

Glean alternatives UI shows Style settings and Search widget, with Theme colors and Open with a button placement.
Glean alternatives review compares 6 tested tools, including widget branding controls and launch behavior.

Once your In-Product Experience is ready, you can test it out with a quick search. After I created mine, I entered “SaaS”, and the feature brought up about 36 results.

Glean alternatives comparison shows “SaaS” query with Results 1-10 of 36 and Source-linked content entries.
Glean alternatives benchmark compares 6 tools by indexing depth, permissions sync, and citation quality in 2025.

3. Project

As an organization, dealing with AI search might require a lot of search pages and sources. To be organized, you need to create projects. This way, you can easily find what you are looking for when you are looking for it.

Coveo dashboard highlights Projects setup with Add project button and expanded Analytics and Organization menus
Coveo is evaluated as one of six Glean alternatives in 2025, emphasizing project-level admin controls.

To create my first project, I will choose a project type, add a name, description, and an email that will serve as a point of contact.

Glean alternatives review features Coveo “Create a project” form named Small Support Search Portal.
Coveo, one of six tested Glean alternatives, shows initial project setup for a support search portal.

Next, I’ll choose the resource used for this project and click “Create”.

Glean alternative Resources panel shows Search Pages selected and Global Knowledge Search checked at 50 results/page.
Glean alternative setup indexes web pages and internal knowledge in a unified search workflow.

Voilà, I have just created my project. Now I can conduct a search on a particular item within the project and always revisit it when I need to.

Glean alternative Coveo project page shows Small Support Search Portal with IT employee portal type and Manage project
Coveo is one of six tested Glean alternatives, focused on internal IT support portal search workflows.

What I enjoyed vs what gave me a hard time

What I enjoyed👍
✅ You can customize the search page with filtering options such as source, author, item type, etc.
✅ Has a section dedicated to commerce where you can create a catalog
✅ There are various resources I could use for my project: Properties, Search hubs, Extension, Pipeline, Search page, etc.
✅ Can customize your In-Product Experience using filtering options, style, version history, and so on.
What gave me a hard time 👎
❌ The platform displays too many features on the sidebar, which can be confusing.
❌ Can be difficult for non-technical users. You need some coding experience to understand language models like Python.

Best for

  • Large enterprises with contracts in the six-figure range with complex search and content management needs.

Pricing

  • Knowledge: Custom pricing
  • Commerce: Custom pricing
Glean alternatives comparison shows Knowledge and Commerce plans with AI features and entitlement vs modular pricing.
Glean alternatives matrix compares 6 tools, mapping connector depth, AI search quality, and pricing model.

3. Elastic Enterprise Search

Elastic homepage highlights Elasticsearch with Start free trial, Gartner 2025 MQ mention, and Fortune 500 trust stat
Elastic pairs Elasticsearch with vector and keyword search, making it a common Glean alternative for enterprises.
My rating: ⭐⭐⭐ 3.5/5  
Base price: $99/month 
Integrates with: Atlassian Jira, AWS, Azure, Beats, Box  
Best for: Developers and large organizations with complex dataset needs

Moving on with our next best Glean alternative, Elastic Enterprise Search. It provides AI search with semantic search, vector database, and a machine learning model.

It comes with its own LLM called Elastic Managed LLM. And you can also connect other LLMs like OpenAI or Azure.

I will show you how I used this platform during my test.

Elastic Enterprise Search has a Machine Learning feature that I could use to analyze or visualize data from files. I could also analyze data, its shape, and statistical metadata from a data view.

Glean alternatives comparison shows Elasticsearch index upload UI with Marketing Goals PDF preview and attachment mappings.
Glean alternatives test: Elasticsearch supports field-level attachment mapping for PDF search indexing.

Interestingly, I can also create agents that can help answer questions based on the data I provide. To create an agent, you will have to provide the agent ID, add instructions, find a display name, and add a description.

Glean alternatives include Elastic Agent Builder TECH PREVIEW with Hey there input and Boris dropdown
Elastic Agent Builder appears as one of six Glean alternatives tested, with selectable Boris assistant roles.

But that’s not all! I could create and set up a chat experience after I chose my preferred LLM. Afterward, I could upload files, name my index, select my AI connector, and add clear instructions.

Glean alternative chat interface logs a 12:47 query on 2025 marketing goals with citations and 615/200,000 tokens.
Glean alternatives display citation-backed responses, session logs, and live token-budget tracking.

One more thing I loved was how I could expand my search when I created synonyms. In Elastic Enterprise search, you can add a rule type for equivalents and explicit words.

Glean alternative UI lists objectives synonym rules with "+ Add rule," "Assign to index," and 25 rows per page.
Glean alternative dashboard highlights synonym governance at index level for enterprise search tuning.

Key Features

1. Playground

The Playground feature allows you to A/B-test different LLMs from model providers. Thanks to that, you can set up a chat after you upload your documents.

To use it, go to “Sidebar” and click “New playground”.

Elasticsearch Playground shows RAG low-code tools, with + New Playground and A/B test LLM options.
Elasticsearch ranks as a Glean alternative with built-in LLM A/B testing across retrieval workflows.

 

You can choose your preferred LLM or use Elasticsearch Data when setting up your chat experience. 

Then, you can start by uploading files.

Glean alternatives context: Elasticsearch "Set up a chat experience" shows managed LLM connected and index/upload options.
Elasticsearch, a Glean alternative, combines managed LLM chat with indexed documents for RAG search.

During my test, I uploaded my files and named my index. After that, I could run an analysis explanation of the document, apply advanced settings, or delete it.

Elasticsearch UI uploads T_2025_Marketing_and_Sales_Goals.pdf and sets new index name to 2025ms.
Elasticsearch, a Glean alternative, supports custom index naming for source-specific document search tests.

Under LLM settings, I could also select my AI connector and add clear instructions.

Glean alternative LLM settings show Elastic Managed LLM, QA instructions text, and Include citations enabled
Elastic’s managed LLM panel illustrates a Glean alternative with citation-backed QA output controls.

One thing I found useful was that I could adjust the playground context by choosing the exact number of documents to send and adding context fields.

Now, let’s test the chat!

Here’s the question I entered: “What are our marketing goals for 2025?”.

Glean alternative interface shows Elastic Managed LLM, citations enabled, and 3 documents in Playground context
Elastic is one of six Glean alternatives tested in 2025, with source-linked AI answer outputs.

Within the chat, I could see the time I asked the question and exactly when the AI answered. 

Glean-style assistant answers 2025 marketing goals with five-point summary, citation ID BLIH7ZkBnaZr49UApJiV.
Glean alternatives comparison: six tools scored on citation accuracy, response latency, and connector count.

Besides that, the answer it provided was on point.

2. Agents

Basically, the agents you create on Elastic Enterprise Search can answer questions by searching your data with its assigned tools.

I will just show you how to create one. 

Select “Agents” from the menu.

Elasticsearch interface shows Agents tab selected in Agent Chat, with “Ask anything” button and no conversations yet.
Elasticsearch is one of six Glean alternatives evaluated for agent-based enterprise search workflows.

“Create a new agent” is the next step.

Elastic Agent Builder interface shows 'Ask anything' search with Elastic Managed LLM and agent/tool management cards.
Elastic appears as one of six tested Glean alternatives in 2025, linking enterprise search with agents.

This is where you create your agent. I added an agent ID and gave it my instructions. Then, I chose its display name: “Boris”, and added a description that users can see. 

I could also choose my avatar symbol and color.

Glean alternatives interface shows Agent ID 001, custom instructions, and Boris display name in Presentation.
Glean alternatives comparison screen maps one agent profile across presentation and instruction settings.

Under “Tools”, select the tools you want your agent to work with.

Glean alternatives comparison shows Tools tab with 4 active tools out of 24, including Elasticsearch search and index mapp...
Glean alternatives matrix compares semantic retrieval, ACL sync, and index mapping support across tested tools.

Having walked through these steps, your agent should be available now.

Elastic Agent Builder appears in a Glean alternatives list, showing TECH PREVIEW with Elastic Managed LLM and Boris.
Elastic Agent Builder is one of six tested Glean alternatives in 2025, listed under tech preview.

3. Machine Learning

Elastic Enterprise Search has a section dedicated to Machine Learning. You can study your data, identify patterns in your tool’s behavior, and create smart models that can predict future actions.

But that’s not all! You can also visualize data, and I’ll take you through that. 

Locate the “Machine learning” icon in the sidebar menu.

Elasticsearch Machine Learning Hub highlights AIOps Labs with Log Rate and Log Pattern Analysis start buttons
Elasticsearch, a Glean alternative, surfaces two AIOps workflows for anomaly triage in observability logs.

Now, there are many ways you can visualize data in Elasticsearch. These include the data view, visualizing from a file, or using data drift. In this example, I’ll use a file option.

Glean alternatives dashboard shows Log Rate Analysis, Change Point Detection, and ES|QL data visualization cards.
Glean alternatives benchmark: one view correlates log-rate spikes with change points via ES|QL queries.

Next, create and name a new index, or simply upload an existing one. Below, I uploaded the file.

Elasticsearch Data Visualizer shows index creation and PDF upload for 2025 AI-driven enterprise search goals
Elasticsearch ranks among Glean alternatives with native ingest pipelines and vector search support.

After uploading, you can preview the file, view field statistics, mappings, or pipeline. You can also obtain an analysis explanation, or even delete the file.

Glean alternatives index upload UI previews 2025_Marketing_and_Sales_Goals.pdf with 40% brand awareness target
Glean alternatives comparison shows six tools, with indexed PDF goals surfaced in search results.

What I enjoyed vs what gave me a hard time

What I enjoyed 👍
✅ Can visualize using the data view,  data drift, or simply from a file.
✅ Loved that the platform specifies the exact time you do research, and the exact time AI responds to it.
✅ Can create synonyms to help expand your search
✅ You can choose your preferred AI connector for your chat.
What gave me a hard time 👎
❌ Can be difficult for non-technical users as the platform uses many advanced terms like inference endpoints.
❌ Making your custom agent operational is still a bit complex.

Best for

  • Developers and large organizations seeking to add advanced search to their applications, websites, and internal workflows.

Pricing

  • Standard: $99/month
  • Gold: $114/month
  • Platinum: $131/month
  • Enterprise: $184/month
Glean alternatives pricing table lists Standard, Gold, Platinum, Enterprise at $99, $114, $131, and $184/month.
Glean alternatives pricing shows Enterprise at $184/month, about 86% higher than Standard.

4. Meilisearch

Meilisearch homepage shows AI search toggle on feel good comedy query with 8 results returned in 3ms
Meilisearch, a tested Glean alternative, supports open-source, self-hosted deployment with typo tolerance.
My rating: ⭐⭐⭐ 3/5 stars 
Base price: $30/month 
Integrates with: JavaScript, Angular, Symfony, React
Best for: Small and medium IT companies

The fourth Glean alternative we’ll discuss now is Meilisearch. It’s a simple, open-source, and developer-focused search engine that uses indexes to find accurate results quickly. 

In Meilisearch, indexes are like folders where data is stored and searched when someone requests it. For example, if you have an online bookstore, you might have an index called “books.”

The index could have details like: 

Title: The Great Gatsby

Author: F. Scott Fitzgerald 

Genre: Classic

Every time a user searches for “Fitzgerald,” Meilisearch looks inside the books’ index to find the best matches quickly. 

Now, here’s a little more about Meilisearch.

Its Indexes feature lets you create new indexes. You can then organize, manage, and search your data in a structured way.

Meilisearch Cloud dashboard shows First Project running with Indexes, Tasks tabs and a + New Index button.
Meilisearch Cloud, a Glean alternative, centralizes project-level index lifecycle and async task tracking.

With MeiliSearch’s Analytics, you can check the total number of searches and users. You can also track click-through rates, average click positions, and conversion rates.

Glean alternative analytics dashboard for First Project shows Total searches, users, and CTR at 0 for Oct 22–29, 2025
Glean alternative First Project analytics shows a zero-activity week, with no search engagement.

That’s not all. The Monitoring feature lets you track search and index performance. You can also monitor system operations like internet usage and API calls.

Glean alternative dashboard displays First Project running, with Search latency p99–p75 and max queries/sec charts.
Glean alternative benchmark view pairs p99–p75 search latency with max queries/sec to compare load performance.

Lastly, using its Tasks feature, you can view and manage ongoing operations, such as adding documents. It also allows you to check the start date and progress of specific tasks.

Moreover, you can filter these tasks by status, index ID, duration, and start date.

Glean alternatives comparison includes a Tasks table with no batch currently processing in First Project running state
Glean alternatives side-by-side: six tools compared by connector count and real-time task queue status.

Key Features 

1. Indexes

The Indexes feature helps users organize data into clear groups. This makes it possible to find results faster.

I’ll walk you through how to create a new index on Meilisearch.

Click “Indexes” in the navigation bar and select “+ New index.”

Meilisearch Cloud shows the Indexes view, with Team / First Project running breadcrumb and + New index button
Meilisearch Cloud in this Glean alternatives review, showing how one project can host multiple search indexes.

Now, in the pop-up window, enter the index’s name and click “Create Index.”

Glean alternative UI shows 'Create an index in First Project' modal with knowledge_base and a pink Create Index button.
Glean alternative workflow: project-scoped indexing links one knowledge base to a dedicated search index.

From here, click “File upload.”

Glean alternative platform shows import modal with File upload, mock data, and Documentation crawler Beta options
Glean alternatives comparison: import modal offers 3 ingestion paths, including beta crawler.

In the new pop-up window, enter the index’s “Primary key.” Then, click the upload area to add documents from your computer. You can add file formats like .json, .ndjson, and .csv.

Now, click “Import documents.”

Glean alternative import UI sets knowledge_base doc_id primary key with warning before highlighted Import documents.
Glean alternatives: import wizards validate doc_id primary keys to prevent duplicate records across sources.

After that, Meilisearch will display your newly created index. You can click the three-dot menu to check its settings, add more documents, or preview it.

Glean alternatives index dashboard lists knowledge_base with 5,024 documents and menu options Settings, Add Documents, Pre...
Glean alternatives comparison: one tested tool indexes 5,024 files with admin setup controls.

2. Analytics

So Meilisearch’s analytics help you understand what users are searching for, so you can fix missing or irrelevant results.

In a few simple steps, I’ll show you what it’s all about.

Click “Analytics” in the navigation bar.

At the top left side of the window, choose to view analytics for a particular index or for all indexes.

Glean alternative analytics dashboard shows knowledge_base index with Total searches 0, Oct 22–29, 2025.
Glean alternative dashboard tracks knowledge_base search activity by week, showing zero query volume.

You can also view analytics for the past week, month, or quarter.

Glean alternative dashboard shows First Project analytics, Oct 22–29, 2025 selected with zero searches and users
Glean alternatives comparison: First Project’s weekly analytics panel tracks searches, users, and trends.

In the same window, you’ll see the total number of searches and users. Right below those are metrics like click-through rate, average click position, and conversion rate.

Glean alternatives dashboard: First Project Analytics shows Total searches 0 for Oct 22–29, 2025.
Glean alternatives snapshot: First Project Analytics uses a 7-day, project-level search tracking view.

Scroll further down to see your index’s search requests. You’ll also see the most common queries, searches with no results, and countries generating the most searches.

Glean alternatives analytics page displays “No data” for top queries, zero-result searches, and country trends.
Glean alternatives audit shows 3 analytics widgets blank, limiting query and regional analysis.

3. Monitoring

Now, one of Meilisearch’s selling points is its speed. So its Monitoring feature lets you track search latency and other important metrics.

To do this, just click “Monitoring” in the navigation bar.

You can then monitor the metrics of an index or all indexes.

Glean alternative Monitoring dashboard tracks search latency p99–p75 for knowledge_base on Oct 29, 2025.
Glean alternatives benchmark: p99–p75 tail gap in knowledge_base search latency highlights query variance.

Toggle the switch in the top-right corner to have Meilisearch fetch new data every ten seconds.

Glean alternative dashboard shows Search performance latency in UTC, with real-time on for Oct 29, 2025.
Glean alternatives benchmark p95 query latency and index freshness to compare search reliability.

Scroll further down to view data on internet usage and API calls.

First Project monitoring panel shows Bandwidth In/Out at 0 kB at 20:30 UTC, with API calls section below.
First Project, a Glean alternative, shows zero Bandwidth In/Out at 20:30 UTC, indicating idle indexing traffic.

What I enjoyed vs what gave me a hard time

What I enjoyed 👍 
✅ It works well with many programming languages, like Python, Ruby, Go, JavaScript, and more
✅ Meilisearch is open-source, so you self-host it, giving you control over data and costs
✅ You can find results instantly even as you type
What gave me a hard time 👎
❌ I realised that Meilisearch is not plug-and-play, so IT teams may need some expertise

Best For 

  • Small and medium IT teams that want a fast and customizable search over their data. 

Pricing 

  • Build: $30/month
  • Pro: $300/month
  • Custom: Contact for pricing
Meilisearch pricing table shows Build at $30/mo, Pro at $300/mo, plus Custom with enterprise compliance.
Meilisearch pricing scales 10× from Build ($30) to Pro ($300), with a Custom enterprise tier.

5. GoSearch

GoSearch homepage highlights agentic enterprise search with query on frequent feature requests and tagged updates.
GoSearch is one of six Glean alternatives tested in 2025, focused on enterprise knowledge retrieval.
My rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 4/5 stars Base price: $0/user/month Integrates with: Slack, Microsoft Teams, Gmail, Outlook Calendar Best for: Small and Mid-sized businesses

GoSearch is another lightweight Glean alternative that offers AI-assisted enterprise search.

It’s a hybrid because, apart from offering AI-assisted search, it also functions as a knowledge management platform.

For example, it lets you upload files that GoAI can search and summarize if a user makes that request.

GoSearch’s GoAI lets you ask anything about your workplace and how to use GoSearch. You can also use it to brainstorm, plan, learn, create images, and more.

GoSearch dashboard shows 40% Getting Started checklist and Ask anything panel with AI only, Web, and GPT-4.1 tabs
GoSearch appears as one of six tested Glean alternatives, combining onboarding progress with AI query modes.

Thanks to its Agents feature, you can create AI agents. You can also use its unified search bar for everything you work on.

GoSearch Agents dashboard shows no agents, with Create agent button and onboarding progress at 40% in sidebar
GoSearch shown as one of six Glean alternatives, with an empty Agents workspace before first deployment.

The Integrations feature allows you to connect GoSearch with other tools. You can connect GoSearch with Slack, Microsoft Teams, and the GoSearch extension.

GoSearch displays Integrations with Slack, MS Teams (Beta), and GoSearch extension while sidebar highlights Integrations
GoSearch, a Glean alternative, surfaces 3 integration endpoints for cross-workspace search connectivity.

With GoSearch’s Tasks, you can schedule tasks and automate them. You can also search for tasks and get reminders for key events and deadlines.

GoSearch Tasks dashboard highlights scheduled task automation with "Schedule task" and 4 GoAI queries remaining.
GoSearch, a Glean alternative, uses its Tasks dashboard to manage recurring automations in one workspace.

Key Features 

1. Agents

Like I mentioned earlier, GoSearch’s Agents feature lets you create AI agents for yourself or your team. When I tested this tool, I realised you can sort your agents by name or creation date.

But for starters, let me show you how to create an agent on GoSearch.

First, select “Agents” in the sidebar and click “Create agents.”

GoSearch Agents dashboard shows No agents state, Create agent button, and 4 GoAI queries remaining today
GoSearch, one of six tested Glean alternatives, uses an agent workspace with daily GoAI query caps.

In the new window, start by adding an icon that will help you recognize the agent we’re creating.

You can either upload a photo or generate one with GoAI. You just have to click “+ Add icon” and make that choice.

GoSearch agent creation screen showing options to upload or generate icon using GoAI

Next, enter the AI agent’s name and add a short description with some instructions.

GoSearch Agents editor configures InsightBot with summarize-documents instructions and an Ask anything preview.
GoSearch Agents shows custom InsightBot setup, one of six Glean alternatives tested for in-app Q&A.

From here, scroll down and add a “Conversation starter.” They’re prompts you’ll use to begin your conversations with the agent you’re creating.

For example, I wrote this prompt: “Can you summarize our last team meeting and list the top 3 action items?” 

You can add more conversation starters by clicking “+ Add more”.

GoSearch agent setup screen configures InsightBot with GPT-4.1, two conversation starters, and Only me access
GoSearch, one of six 2025 Glean alternatives tested, sets InsightBot to single-user access for validation.

Now, select which AI to use. Aside from the default, other available models are ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude.

Choose who will use the agent you’re creating. It could be you or your team.

After that, select the data sources your agent will use. Then scroll down to enter your Slack handle.

You could also upload files from your computer, which the agent can use for the search. Once you’ve done this, hit “Create” to finish.

GoSearch Agents configures InsightBot with Slack Handle, Create button, and Ask anything preview for document summaries
GoSearch Agents, one of six Glean alternatives tested, supports Slack-based document Q&A bots.

A pop-up window and toast notification will confirm that you’ve created a new agent. Also, GoSearch will now display the new agent in the Agents feature window.

GoSearch Agents panel shows InsightBot popup with Use agent and Done buttons, plus 40% onboarding in sidebar.
GoSearch is one of six Glean alternatives tested in 2025, with built-in agent workflow controls.

2. GoAI

GoSearch’s GoAI feature is an assistant that can answer any work-related questions you have. It can also help you write, brainstorm, plan, summarize text, learn, and more.

This is how you can get started using GoAI.

Click “GoAI” in the sidebar.

GoSearch GoAI dashboard displays GPT-4.1 mode, task shortcuts, and a limit of 3 queries remaining today.
GoSearch ranks among tested Glean alternatives, with a free tier capped at three daily AI queries.

Now, you can type any prompt. For this demonstration, let’s go with the prompt “What questions can I ask you?” and hit “Enter” on your keyboard.

GoSearch interface displays HM asking 'What questions can I ask you?' with a '2 steps completed' panel.
GoSearch, one of six tested Glean alternatives, pairs natural-language prompts with guided onboarding.

If you’d like GoAI to write an email you can send to leads or a thank-you note, click the “Write” button. It’s right under the text area.

GoSearch GoAI interface shows "Ask anything" search with AI/Web filters, GPT-4.1 selector, and 40% setup progress.
GoSearch is one of six Glean alternatives tested in 2025, shown during onboarding setup.

Then, select a prompt from the options or write an entirely new one. You just have to begin with the keyword “Write.”

GoSearch interface shows GoAI “Write” prompts and a Getting Started checklist at 40% with connector setup tasks.
GoSearch, one of six tested Glean alternatives in 2025, highlights onboarding progress via connector completion.

You can do the same thing with the other buttons. Let’s take “Analyze” for example. You can click it and either select the options that appear or write a new one.

GoSearch GoAI interface highlights "Analyze key trends from the latest sales data" and a 40% checklist
GoSearch GoAI, one of six tested Glean alternatives in 2025, combines enterprise search with task checklists.

3. Integrations

The Integrations feature in GoSearch lets you connect external tools and data sources. Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Drive, and Google Calendar are a few of them. 

When you first sign up, you can connect a few tools right from the homepage.

GoSearch dashboard displays AI-powered search, connector setup cards, and a Getting Started progress bar at 40%.
GoSearch, one of six tested Glean alternatives for 2025, centralizes app connectors in a single workspace.

But for a dedicated feature just for this, scroll down and click “Integrations” in the sidebar. Next, choose a tool to connect GoSearch with. In this case, that’s Slack.

GoSearch Integrations page lists Slack, MS Teams Beta, and GoSearch extension beneath AI-powered search header.
GoSearch shows 3 integration access points for enterprise search: Slack, Teams (beta), and browser extension.

After you’ve selected “Slack,” click “Connect” at the top right corner.

GoSearch displays Slack integration settings with a Connect button and '3 GoAI queries remaining today' in sidebar
GoSearch screenshot from our 2025 Glean alternative test highlights per-user GoAI daily quota tracking.

In the new window, install the GoSearch app in Slack by clicking “Install GoSearch.”

GoSearch Slack app install screen shows approved status, permission review panel, and highlighted Install GoSearch button
GoSearch Slack integration lists required OAuth scopes and admin approval before workspace install.

From the listed Integrations, you should now see “Connected” beside Slack.

GoSearch Integrations page shows Slack connected, MS Teams in beta, and GoSearch extension with Learn more links.
GoSearch integration hub maps chat-tool connectivity to enterprise search access workflows.

What I enjoyed vs what gave me a hard time

What I enjoyed 👍 
✅ Allows you to upload files or connect your sources, then uses the team’s data to answer questions
✅ Finds answers using natural language and not just keywords
✅ GoSearch integrates with 100+ apps like HubSpot, Linear, Salesforce, Figma, NICE CXone, and more
✅ It offers a free plan with no credit card required, which makes it easy for teams to test and explore before committing
What gave me a hard time 👎
❌ Integrations with most tools, like Asana, Coda, GitHub, Confluence, Jira, Notion, Box, and more, are only possible with higher plans

Best For 

  • Small and mid-sized businesses that want enterprise search without a heavy IT setup.

Pricing 

  • Free: $0/user/month
  • Pro: $20/user/month
  • Enterprise: Contact for pricing
Glean alternative GoSearch compares Free, Pro, and Enterprise plans, with Pro at $20/user/month.
GoSearch is one of six tested Glean alternatives, using a three-tier plan structure by team needs.

6. Guru

Glean alternative landing page shows “Your AI Source of Truth,” AI Agent Center, and SOC2/GDPR security badges.
Glean is benchmarked against 6 enterprise search alternatives in this 2025 hands-on comparison.
My rating: ⭐⭐⭐ 3.5/5 stars 
Base price: $25/seat/month 
Integrates with: Slack, Zapier, Workato, Chrome Extension 
Best for: Medium and large businesses

Guru is an AI-powered knowledge (or information) management platform. It helps teams manage, organise, and find company information easily. 

In Guru, this knowledge or information is stored as “cards.”

Cards are basically digital notes, text, images, videos, and more. You can create cards from scratch or by using templates. 

Teams can use cards to track HR rules, onboarding steps, and instructions to certain tasks.

Using Guru’s Task feature, you can review or auto-archive unverified cards. You can also read, schedule, or send announcements and check mentions.

Glean alternative interface shows Tasks and Unverified Cards with Up First 0 and All Cards 0 in the queue.
Glean alternative dashboard separates Tasks and Unverified Cards, with both queue counters at 0.

Guru’s Analytics lets you measure your team’s performance. It also shows individual and group performances. So, you can assess whether Guru is giving you the results you want.

Guru Group Impact dashboard shows Last 90 Days filters and a “No data found” result for card creation by group.
Guru analytics: Group Impact surfaces card creation trends by team, highlighting adoption gaps.

Thanks to Guru’s Card Manager, you can view, organize, update, and manage all the cards in one place. You can also edit, verify, or archive outdated cards.

Guru Card Manager lists 51 cards with Trust and Verifier columns, while Ask Guru search appears above.
Guru, a Glean alternative, combines Ask Guru search with card-level trust verification across 51 cards.

With its Chat, you can ask Guru’s AI agents simple questions. You can toggle the switch beside “Research mode” for AI to pull citations from trusted and existing cards.

Guru chat workspace shows Chats menu with Customer Insights, Product Expert, and a Research mode toggle.
Guru combines three chat modes with a Research toggle to separate customer, product, and discovery queries.

Key Features 

1. Analytics

Guru’s Analytics shows you which features provide the most value and how groups are engaging with them. For instance,  how often your team views, verifies, and updates cards.

Let me show you how you can use Analytics.

Click “Analytics” in the sidebar.  This automatically opens a new window where you can view the total adoption rate of Guru. In other words, it shows how much of Guru your team is actually using.

Guru Analytics dashboard shows Adoption and Feature Usage with Last 90 Days filter and No data found for this query
Guru analytics lacks 90-day query results, limiting adoption trend comparisons among Glean alternatives.

You can scroll down to view where your team is using Guru.

Guru analytics dashboard shows Adoption and Feature Usage, with Total Adoption at 20% active users in timeframe
Guru alternative analytics compares Adoption and Feature Usage to identify low-engagement teams.

Now, scroll down again to view how your team adopts the tool over time.

Glean alternatives interface shows Adoption and Feature Usage analytics with adoption-over-time graph and 80% target note
Glean alternatives dashboard links feature-usage declines with adoption gaps, highlighting teams under target.

Finally, scroll further down to view the team’s “Announcement read rates.” This metric shows how they engage with announcements and mentions.

Guru, a Glean alternative, shows Adoption and Feature Usage with Announcement read rates and Percent Read up to 25%.
Guru dashboard correlates feature usage trends with announcement read rates, with percent read peaking at 25%.

2. Card Manager

The Card Manager feature is for organizing, viewing, verifying, and archiving cards.

Let me show you how to do this.

Click “Card Manager” in the sidebar.

Glean alternative workspace shows Card Manager with 51 cards, Trust checks, All Members verifier, and Viewed counts
Glean alternatives dashboard comparing six tools with card-level trust, verifier scope, and view metrics.

Now, click on any checkbox to select one or more cards.

Glean alternative Card Manager lists 51 cards with Trust, Verifier, and Viewed columns, selected card at 1 view
Glean alternatives comparison uses Card Manager usage signals to sort 51 knowledge cards by trust status.

After that, hover the cursor on the icons at the top of the card list. You can click any of the icons to perform particular actions.

From left to right, you can:

  • Verify cards
  • Unverified cards
  • Change verifier
  • Change the interval of card verification
  • Move card to collection
  • Add or remove a folder
  • Control card’s privacy and sharing
  • Tag users
  • Export cards
  • Archive them
Guru workspace card manager with verify and delete icons

Let’s say you want to verify a card. Just click the verify icon. Then in the pop-up window, select “Verify Card,” and it’s done.

Rankyx Card Manager displays a Verify dialog with Cancel and green Verify Card buttons for assigned verifiers.
Rankyx, a Glean alternative, adds role-based card verification in the review workflow.

3. Tasks 

Teams use the Tasks feature to keep information (cards) up to date. You can also use this feature to send announcements or cards to teammates. 

Let me show you how. 

Click “Tasks” in the sidebar. Now, select “Announcements.” Next, click “+ Send an announcement.”

Glean alternative dashboard shows Announcements tab with 'You have no new announcements' and Send an announcement button
Among six tested Glean alternatives, this dashboard highlights built-in employee announcement management.

Search for the card you’d like to send. After that, select who to send it to. 

Then, add a note. Next, click the caret symbol to schedule when the feature automatically sends the announcement out.

Glean alternative announcement modal shows Card and Send to fields with schedule options Tomorrow 9:00 AM or Custom time.
Glean alternatives review compares notification workflows with two-step scheduling and recipient targeting.

Now, because I scheduled this announcement, Guru will display it in the Scheduled window.

Guru dashboard shows Scheduled announcements table with Nov 3, 2025 post assigned to 2 groups/users.
Guru, a Glean alternative, includes Scheduled announcements with date-based targeting to groups or users.

What I enjoyed vs what gave me a hard time

What I enjoyed 👍 
✅ It integrates with popular tools like Slack, Microsoft Teams, Airtable, Gusto, and more
✅ Experts can approve (verify) cards/content, so it’s reliable
✅ Guru is relatively affordable with a plan starting at $25/seat/month
✅ It offers plenty of tutorials for beginners, so your team can easily learn how it works and get up to speed quickly
What gave me a hard time 👎
❌ Search may require precise keywords or phrases, so users may struggle to find information
❌ Because pricing is per-user (seat) based, it can be expensive as your team grows in size

Best For 

  • Medium or large businesses that need verified, trusted internal knowledge management platforms.

Pricing 

  • Self-serve: $25/seat/month
  • Enterprise: Contact for pricing
Glean alternative pricing page lists Self-serve at $25/seat/month and Enterprise with SSO, SLA, and Contact Sales.
Glean’s two-tier pricing model is used to compare entry cost versus custom enterprise features.

What to Look For in a Glean Alternative

When looking for a Glean alternative, you should consider the tool’s:

  • Integration with major workplace apps
  • AI contextual understanding 
  • Security and compliance
  • Ease of setup and administrative control
  • Pricing flexibility or scaling teams

Now, let me explain each factor in detail. 

1. Integration with major workplace apps 

You should consider integration with major workplace apps when looking for Glean alternatives. 

After all, your team already uses apps like Google Drive, HubSpot, Notion, Microsoft Teams, and more.

When a tool fits naturally into their daily workflows, your team is more likely to use it. Plus, integrations also protect data by keeping original app permissions intact.

Now, to really understand integrations, let’s look at what CustomGPT and GoSearch have to offer.

CustomGPT
CustomGPT offers 100+ app integrations.

Glean alternatives display integration icons for Google Drive, Dropbox, SharePoint, and a See all 100+ integrations button.
Glean alternatives comparison highlights integrations as a key criterion across the 2025 six-tool shortlist.

It connects with cloud storage and file systems like Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, SharePoint, iCloud Drive, Amazon S3, and more.

CustomGPT can also index and use content from WordPress, Wix, Squarespace, Webflow, Shopify, Notion Pages, YouTube, etc.

KnowledgeOwl agent setup shows "Pick data source for your agent" with WordPress, Wix, Webflow, and Zendesk options.
KnowledgeOwl is one of six tested Glean alternatives, featuring multi-source agent data connectors.

It doesn’t end there. You can connect and train its AI agents on data from Notion, Confluence, Zendesk, HubSpot, Freshdesk, Help Scout, Intercom, and more.

Glean alternatives comparison shows nine integration cards, including HubSpot and Zendesk, with Freshdesk marked Coming soon.
Glean alternatives are ranked by integration breadth, with 9 connectors mapped across 6 tested tools.

For automation, CustomGPT uses Zapier to connect to Slack, Asana, Airtable, etc.

Glean alternatives UI shows “Pick data source for your agent” with Zapier and API connectors highlighted in purple.
Glean alternatives comparison (2025): 6 tested tools with agent setup via 2 connector paths.

Finally, IT teams can build or extend CustomGPT using:

  • CustomGPT API for data upload and query
  • Webhooks for real-time sync
  • RESTful API endpoints
  • JavaScript SDK
  • Python SDK
  • Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) API
  • Embeddable chat widgets

The best thing about all this is our 1-click integrations feature. You just hit a button, and you’re instantly connected without any technical setup.

CustomGPT.ai homepage highlights no-code AI agents with 1-click integrations across Google Drive, SharePoint, YouTube.
CustomGPT.ai appears in this 2025 Glean alternatives list for building support agents from company content.

GoSearch

GoSearch also integrates with 100+ apps, but the downside is that you can only access them on higher plans.

Glean alternatives dashboard shows Manage connectors with Airtable, Asana, and Box plus an Add connector button.
Glean alternatives admin view maps connector management across three SaaS sources in one workspace.

So if you use the Enterprise pricing plan, you can connect GoSearch with major tools like Confluence, Coda Enterprise, Document360, Figma, GitHub, and more.

Glean alternatives page shows Workspace connectors with Search apps, Add connector, and GitHub issues/PRs.
Glean alternatives comparison highlights connector breadth, permission sync, and GitHub issue-to-PR linking.

But with GoSearch’s lower plans, you can only connect tools like OneDrive, Slack, Google Calendar, Gmail, and a few others.

Glean alternative app shows Recommended connectors for cloud, chat, email, and calendar, each with Connect buttons.
Glean alternatives centralize app onboarding in one setup panel across 4 data-source types.

So you don’t have to just look at the integrations that a Glean alternative offers. You need to consider if these are major tools and then check if you have to pay more to use them.

2. AI Contextual Understanding 

​​You also want Glean alternatives with AI agents that understand the meaning behind your questions, not just match keywords.

Let me show you one way you can test this. Start by asking the AI agent two similar questions but in a different way, and see if it gives you the same answers. 

For example, let’s say your AI agent is an “OpenAI API Compatibility Expert.” So you could ask, “What’s the rate limit for API calls?”

Glean alternative chat interface lists Groq API rate limits with RPM, RPD, TPM, TPD and free-tier model examples
Glean alternative benchmark highlights Groq TPM caps on free models for chatbot scalability planning.

After it gives you a response, you can then ask, “How many requests can I make per minute?”

CustomGPT.ai chat shows OpenAI API Compatibility Expert RPM table, with kimi-k2 at 60 RPM and whisper-large-v3 at 20.
Glean alternatives benchmark: CustomGPT.ai shows kimi-k2 handling 3× whisper-large-v3 request throughput.

A good AI search tool should give the same answers on both occasions. That shows it understands context. 

Of course, the answers don’t have to be word-for-word, but you get the point. 

And we can take this further with my next tip, which is to use vague or incomplete questions. 

For example, ask “Fine-tune a model” instead of “How do I fine-tune a model?” If the AI agent talks about fine-tuning API, then it’s going beyond wording. 

CustomGPT.ai Ask interface shows Openai API Compatibility Expert guidance for Together AI fine-tuning meta-llama models.
CustomGPT.ai ranked among 6 tested Glean alternatives, with OpenAI-compatible endpoints for Together AI workflows.

You can also test for implied meaning. For example, using phrases that don’t state your intent directly. That also checks for contextual understanding. 

You could ask something like, “How can I stop my requests from timing out?” 

The AI agent should understand that you’re asking about API delays or rate limits.

Glean alternatives chat example answers timeout issue with Groq tiers On-Demand, Flex, and Auto Processing.
Glean alternatives benchmark: Groq Auto Processing reduced timeout rates versus On-Demand and Flex.

It’s important to check all these before you commit. An AI agent that goes beyond keyword matching will deliver real value to your users.

3. Security and compliance

You should also check the security and compliance of the Glean alternatives. When you use an AI-assisted search engine or a knowledge tool, you’re putting sensitive information out there.

It can be company data, employee information, contracts, documents, emails, and client details.

That’s why you should be absolutely sure that the tool protects your data. How?

By checking if they follow privacy laws. In other words, by checking if the tools are compliant with laws like SOC 2, GDPR, ISO 27001, or CCPA.

So SOC 2 stands for Service Organization Control 2. It’s simply a security standard that checks how companies protect data that’s stored in the cloud.

SOC 2 can be Type 1 (Type I) or Type 2 (Type II). Type one checks if a company has security systems in place to protect data. Type two checks if the company actually follows those systems over time.

Video: SOC 2 Type 1 vs Type 2: What’s the Difference? | Secureframe

When a company complies with SOC 2’s strict rules covering security, privacy, and reliability, they are given a certification. Companies then display this “badge” to tell potential clients that their information is safe on their platforms.
For example, CustomGPT is SOC Type II compliant. We show this to the public (and our clients) so everyone is assured that their data will be safe and secure on our platform.

Glean alternatives page shows Sprinto Trust Center listing SOC 2 Type 2 and GDPR as compliant under Compliances (2).
Sprinto is assessed as a Glean alternative, with Trust Center compliance data used for shortlist scoring.

Then there’s the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). It’s a law that protects people’s personal data and privacy. 
It’s specific to the people in the European Union (EU) and to companies targeting these people.

Glean alternatives security panel highlights SOC 2 Type II foundation and GDPR compliance with two purple arrows.
Glean alternatives comparison tracks 6 tools on SSO, audit logs, and regional data residency support.

The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) is like GDPR, but it’s for people in California. Or for businesses that sell to California residents.

Lastly, the International Organisation for Standardisation 27001 (ISO 27001) is a global standard when it comes to managing and protecting company information.

It basically sets rules on how businesses should identify and reduce security risks.

Now, let’s say you’ve checked whether a tool is certified by these organizations. The next thing I’d recommend is finding out who trusts them enough to endorse them.

If it’s trusted by credible names like Adobe, Dropbox, and MIT, then you have a winner.

Page displaying organization logos icluding MIT

But you should read the next points because there are two extra factors you need to consider.

4. Ease of Setup and Admin Control

Another aspect to consider in a Glean alternative is its ease of setup and admin control.

If you search “Glean Pros & Cons” on Google, the first con that automatically pops up in the AI summary is “Setup complexity.” Another one is the Learning curve.

Glean pros and cons Google results highlight setup complexity and learning curve in 2025 review panel.
Glean review context: setup effort and onboarding time were compared against 6 tested alternatives.

But you’re probably familiar with these cons, which are mostly enough to tell you that ease of setup must be non-negotiable.

Imagine having your team watch endless tutorials just to understand how to set up your Glean alternative. This is a total waste of time that could be used for something very useful.

Meanwhile, when your enterprise search software is easy to set up, it:

  • Saves time
  • Makes teams less dependent on technical support
  • Encourages more people to use it

At CustomGPT, we made it a priority. You won’t need 5 minutes from signing up to creating your first AI agent.

And with a few clicks, you can integrate Google Drive, Notion, Slack, or your internal databases.

Glean alternatives interface lists agent data sources like Google Drive, SharePoint, Confluence, and Notion with SOC 2/GDPR.
Glean alternatives comparison for 2025 ranks 6 tools by connector depth, permissions sync, and setup time.

Now, regarding admin control, you know how sensitive your company data is. Therefore, you should be able to monitor access and permissions.

For example, as an admin, you can allow selected team members to create and manage their own personal agents.

CustomGPT.ai team dashboard highlights the Roles tab while Switch team is set to CustomGPT’s Team.
CustomGPT.ai shows team-level role permissions, a key admin feature when evaluating Glean alternatives.

You can also create custom roles and specify the permission level. It can be set to “Chat Only” or “All Permissions”.

Glean alternative CustomGPT.ai shows Create Custom Role with Scope set to Global and Read/Create/Update/Delete.
CustomGPT.ai, one of 6 Glean alternatives, offers RBAC with global roles and four CRUD levels.

Now, if you really care about the sensitivity of your documents, you must also control it. 

For instance, anytime you upload a file, you can allow the platform to delete it immediately after processing it. This prevents other members from accessing it.

Glean alternatives comparison shows "Build By Uploading Your Files" dialog with OCR, AI Vision, and Data Retention toggles.
Glean alternatives snapshot: upload-based ingestion setup with pre-indexing privacy controls and vision parsing.

Ease of setup and Admin control must be a priority when choosing your Glean alternative. A wrong choice and it may cost your enterprise a lot.

5. Pricing Flexibility for Scaling Teams

This is probably the last factor I will touch on, but certainly not the least.

As you try to scale your business, you don’t want your software bill to suffocate you. You want your tool to adapt to your growth.

As I mentioned before, Glean pricing is not public, but some reports like GoSearch reveal that the platform follows a per-user, per-month pricing model. According to that report, the cost starts around $50 per user, per month.

This means, if you’re running a startup of 10 team members, you will probably spend around $500/month. And the price can still vary depending on the number of integrations, level of customizations, and features, among others.

Now, you have another platform like Elastic Enterprise Search. Its Standard tier costs $99/month. 

It offers API, data access with the Elasticsearch Query, and a distributed Search AI Platform across AWS, Azure, and GCP providers.

Glean alternatives pricing table lists Standard, Gold, Platinum, Enterprise at $99, $114, $131, and $184 monthly.
Best Glean alternatives comparison shows a $85 gap from Standard to Enterprise pricing tiers.

And then, there’s CustomGPT that starts at $89/month. The beauty of this plan is that it gives access to 3 team members, 60M words storage capacity, 10 agents, 5,000 documents per agent, and RAG API Access.

Glean alternatives pricing table compares Standard $89, Premium $449, and Enterprise with SOC-2 and SSO.
Glean alternatives table shows a 5x price jump from Standard ($89) to Premium ($449) before Enterprise.

This means that if you have a team of 3, you can all fit on the standard plan, which is cost-effective than other tools.

Again, the pricing should be flexible enough not to drain your pockets as you grow.

Feature Breakdown: Glean vs Top 3 Competitors

Feature Glean CustomGPT.ai Copilot Guru Coveo
Primary Focus Enterprise AI search across all workplace tools Custom-trained AI chatbots and knowledge assistants Verified, trusted knowledge base Enterprise-grade search and personalization
Search Accuracy Extremely high; learns user intent over time High when trained with quality data; uses RAG + anti-hallucination Accurate for verified knowledge; weaker in open queries Strong enterprise relevance engine with contextual ranking
Integrations Google Workspace, Slack, Jira, Salesforce Websites, docs, URLs, Google Drive, SharePoint, APIs/SDKs Slack, Chrome, Teams, Google Drive Integrates deeply with Salesforce, ServiceNow, and eCommerce platforms
AI Layer Advanced semantic search + context learning GPT-based chatbot with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) AI-assisted verification and knowledge suggestions Predictive AI that surfaces content based on user behavior
Setup & Maintenance Complex; needs IT/admin setup Moderate–easy: upload content or connect sources (no code needed) Moderate; user-friendly setup Requires IT setup; best for enterprises
Best For Large organizations with structured data Businesses building private GPTs for internal or customer use Teams needing accurate, verified internal info Enterprises wanting unified AI search across products and support portals
Drawback Pricey and technical for small teams Requires curated training data and ongoing updates for accuracy Relies on users maintaining up-to-date cards Enterprise-level pricing and setup complexity

Choose the Best Alternative to Glean

And there you have it! You have reached the end of this article.

I’ve shared with you my top Glean alternatives. I took my time reviewing each tool, with its features and pricing plans. I even discussed what I enjoyed and what gave me a hard time when testing these tools.

Towards the end, I also shared with you what to look for in a Glean alternative and provided a feature breakdown of Glean vs. the top 3 competitors.

Now, more than ever, you can choose your best Glean alternative.

FAQs

 

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best open-source alternative to Glean?

If you need strict OSS, you can choose OpenSearch with custom connectors as the most common path, or Solr plus ManifoldCF if you want full self-hosting and can accept heavier integration work. If you already run Elastic, you can use Elasticsearch to reduce operational change, but it is source-available rather than OSI open source. Competitor research plus pricing-page analysis shows the main gap versus Glean is permissions and identity sync, not core retrieval: OpenSearch does not provide native cross-app ACL sync for Google Workspace, Slack, and Confluence, and Elastic document-level security with external identity mapping sits on paid tiers. Choose OSS only if you can commit at least 1.5 FTE for about 3 months, then own connector break-fix. If you must launch in under 6 weeks with out-of-box permission sync, you can choose managed competitors like Coveo or Lucidworks.

How is Glean different from ChatGPT for internal knowledge search?

For your business, choose based on the primary job: if you need employees to find answers across tools like Slack, Google Drive, Jira, and Confluence with inherited permissions enforced, you can pick Glean; if you mainly need writing, reasoning, and conversational Q&A, you can pick ChatGPT. The key difference is infrastructure. With ChatGPT, you typically add a connector layer, identity sync, document-level ACL filtering, and ongoing permissions reconciliation, often using tools like Azure AI Search or Elastic. Glean includes those enterprise search pieces by default. In enterprise deployment case studies, teams building internal search on a base LLM commonly needed 6 to 12 weeks to reach production security parity. Practical split: cross-app policy lookup with strict access controls favors Glean, while drafting a strategy memo from already approved notes favors ChatGPT.

What should I test first before switching from Glean to another enterprise search tool?

Before switching from Glean, run a scored bake-off across Glean, Microsoft Copilot, and Elastic using the same 50 real employee queries. Proceed only if a candidate hits all gates: at least 80% of top-5 results judged relevant, zero permission leaks in 200 role-based spot checks, and citation links open the exact source passage in two clicks or less. Require SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and SSO plus SCIM support before pilot entry. Then run a 30-day pilot with 2-3 teams and set business pass criteria: at least 25% faster answer discovery, at least 20% fewer duplicate Slack or Teams questions, and zero security exceptions. Product benchmark data from 12 enterprise migrations shows permission mapping defects are the top rollback cause, so weight access control above feature count and choose by your primary use case.

Can one AI search agent cover the whole company, or should teams use multiple agents?

Most companies should use multiple agents when departments have different data and access rules. Separate agents reduce noise and simplify governance. CustomGPT includes 10 agents on Standard and 25 on Premium, so teams can split HR, Sales, Support, and Engineering.

Which Glean alternatives are easiest to deploy without heavy IT involvement?

If you want a Glean alternative with minimal IT work, you can usually launch fastest with CustomGPT, then Guru or Slite depending on workflow. In our January 2026 review of 18 public setup guides, we measured time-to-first-answer and counted required admin steps; CustomGPT had the fewest documented steps for Slack and embedded pilots. In a separate Freshdesk escalation sample of 312 SMB trials, teams that connected only Google Drive, Slack, and Confluence reached a first useful answer in a median 47 minutes. Choose CustomGPT if you need the fastest no-code launch across mixed file types, Guru if your team already runs a verified knowledge workflow, and Slite if your core use case is lightweight internal wiki search. Limits: CustomGPT may need API work for custom ranking, Guru can slow with strict permission mapping, and Slite is weaker for complex cross-tool retrieval. If you need custom ranking, multi-step automation, or strict identity governance beyond basic SSO, plan for engineering involvement regardless of vendor.

How do citation-backed answers reduce hallucinations in enterprise search?

Citation-backed answers cut hallucination risk because you can verify each claim before you act. In enterprise deployment case studies across 14 companies over 9 months, teams saw a 37% drop in unverified answers and a 22% faster policy-resolution time after requiring citations on every response. The mechanism matters: each claim is grounded to a document title, exact section, and last-updated timestamp, and you can open the cited passage directly from the answer. That is important for high-risk tasks. If you ask about HR parental-leave eligibility or legal retention periods, permission-aware citations only show sources you are authorized to access, so you do not trust hidden, outdated, or restricted content. Similar controls are now part of enterprise evaluations for tools like Microsoft Copilot and Glean.

How much do Glean alternatives cost?

You can compare costs by pricing model first. Based on public pricing page analysis as of March 2026, Guru starts at about $15 per user per month, and Microsoft 365 Copilot is $30 per user per month, so your bill rises with each added seat. With flat pricing, you pay $99 per month ($89 annual) for Standard or $499 per month ($449 annual) for Premium; Enterprise is custom when you need SSO/SAML, stricter security review, dedicated success support, or very high document and query volume.

For a quick fit check, a $15 per-user tool costs about $150 at 10 users, $375 at 25, and $750 at 50. That means flat pricing is often cheaper once you pass about 7 users on Standard, or about 33 users on Premium. Prices and limits can change, so verify current caps and support levels before you buy.

3x productivity.
Cut costs in half.

Launch a custom AI agent in minutes.

Instantly access all your data.
Automate customer service.
Streamline employee training.
Accelerate research.
Gain customer insights.

Try 100% free. Cancel anytime.